LUCK.REPORT
โ CRITICAL SYSTEM VULNERABILITIES DETECTED โ
ANALYZING: LUCK.IO
๐จ WARNING: MATHEMATICAL IMPOSSIBILITY DETECTED ๐จ
INSOLVENCY PROBABILITY: CRITICAL
INSOLVENCY PROBABILITY: CRITICAL
BANKROLL ANALYSIS
CRITICAL
Single Bet Bankruptcy Risk
MAX_BET: $500,000
MULTIPLIER_REQUIRED: 20x
POTENTIAL_PAYOUT: $10,000,000
ESTIMATED_BANKROLL: ~$10,000,000
RESULT: SINGLE BET CAN DRAIN ENTIRE BANKROLL
MULTIPLIER_REQUIRED: 20x
POTENTIAL_PAYOUT: $10,000,000
ESTIMATED_BANKROLL: ~$10,000,000
RESULT: SINGLE BET CAN DRAIN ENTIRE BANKROLL
CRITICAL
Max Win Exceeds Available Liquidity
ADVERTISED_MAX_WIN: $10,000,000
BANKROLL_CAPACITY: INSUFFICIENT
ANALYSIS: Casino cannot pay max win without insolvency
BANKROLL_CAPACITY: INSUFFICIENT
ANALYSIS: Casino cannot pay max win without insolvency
RISK SIMULATION DATA
EXTREME
Monte Carlo Simulation Results
SIMULATIONS_RUN: 100,000
BETS_PER_SIMULATION: 1,000
MAX_BET_SIZE: $500,000
TARGET_WIN: $12,500,000
PROBABILITY_OF_LOSS > $136M: 5%
VERDICT: UNSUSTAINABLE LIMITS
STATUS: GIGASCAM CONFIRMED
BETS_PER_SIMULATION: 1,000
MAX_BET_SIZE: $500,000
TARGET_WIN: $12,500,000
PROBABILITY_OF_LOSS > $136M: 5%
VERDICT: UNSUSTAINABLE LIMITS
STATUS: GIGASCAM CONFIRMED
TECHNICAL VULNERABILITIES
HIGH
"Non-Custodial" Smart Contract Risk
CLAIM: "Decentralized & Non-Custodial"
REALITY: Admin keys control smart contracts
ATTACK_VECTORS:
[1] contract.pause() โ "Maintenance Mode"
[2] transaction.revert() โ "Failed Transaction"
[3] withdrawal.block() โ "Security Review"
[4] adminKey.transfer() โ Exit Scam
Non-custodial โ Trustless when admin keys exist
REALITY: Admin keys control smart contracts
ATTACK_VECTORS:
[1] contract.pause() โ "Maintenance Mode"
[2] transaction.revert() โ "Failed Transaction"
[3] withdrawal.block() โ "Security Review"
[4] adminKey.transfer() โ Exit Scam
Non-custodial โ Trustless when admin keys exist
HIGH
Domain Hosting Violation
REGISTRAR: Namecheap
GAMBLING_ALLOWED: FALSE
COMPANY_INFO: NONE ADVERTISED
WHOIS_COMPLIANCE: VIOLATION
TOS_BREACH: Multiple violations detected
REPORT_TO: abuse@namecheap.com
GAMBLING_ALLOWED: FALSE
COMPANY_INFO: NONE ADVERTISED
WHOIS_COMPLIANCE: VIOLATION
TOS_BREACH: Multiple violations detected
REPORT_TO: abuse@namecheap.com
OPERATIONAL RED FLAGS
CRITICAL
The "Trustless" Lie
CLAIM: "Trustless casino, no KYC, no AML"
REALITY_CHECK:
"We MAY ask for documentation if bets exceed bankroll"
TRANSLATION:
โโ Small wins: No problem, withdraw freely
โโ Big wins: "Please provide documentation"
โโ Can't provide docs: Funds frozen indefinitely
โโ Can provide docs: Still might not pay
TRUSTLESS* (*terms and conditions apply)
NO KYC* (*except when we decide we need it)
VERDICT: Classic exit scam setup
REALITY_CHECK:
"We MAY ask for documentation if bets exceed bankroll"
TRANSLATION:
โโ Small wins: No problem, withdraw freely
โโ Big wins: "Please provide documentation"
โโ Can't provide docs: Funds frozen indefinitely
โโ Can provide docs: Still might not pay
TRUSTLESS* (*terms and conditions apply)
NO KYC* (*except when we decide we need it)
VERDICT: Classic exit scam setup
CRITICAL
When Big Wins Hit...
SCENARIO: User hits $10M max win
LIKELY_OUTCOMES:
โโ "Game malfunction" claim
โโ "Under investigation" indefinite hold
โโ "Security review" with no resolution
โโ Smart contract "paused for maintenance"
โโ Transaction mysteriously "failed"
โโ "Documentation required" (despite no-KYC claims)
โโ Account "flagged" and frozen
THE MATH ONLY WORKS IF BIG WINNERS DON'T GET PAID
LIKELY_OUTCOMES:
โโ "Game malfunction" claim
โโ "Under investigation" indefinite hold
โโ "Security review" with no resolution
โโ Smart contract "paused for maintenance"
โโ Transaction mysteriously "failed"
โโ "Documentation required" (despite no-KYC claims)
โโ Account "flagged" and frozen
THE MATH ONLY WORKS IF BIG WINNERS DON'T GET PAID
โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ
THE BLOCKCHAIN DOESN'T LIE
BUT THE PEOPLE WHO WROTE THE CONTRACT DO
โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ โ ๏ธ
โ CONCLUSION: LUCK.IO OPERATES WITH IMPOSSIBLE RISK PARAMETERS โ
Either they're lying about bankroll, planning to deny payouts, or genuinely reckless.
All three scenarios end the same way: YOU DON'T GET PAID
Either they're lying about bankroll, planning to deny payouts, or genuinely reckless.
All three scenarios end the same way: YOU DON'T GET PAID
COMPARISON: LEGITIMATE CASINO OPERATIONS
INDUSTRY_STANDARD:
Maximum single bet = 0.5% - 2% of bankroll
Maximum exposure = 5% - 10% of bankroll
LUCK.IO:
Maximum single bet = 100% of bankroll (estimated)
Maximum exposure = UNDEFINED / RECKLESS
VERDICT: NOT OPERATING AS A LEGITIMATE CASINO
Maximum single bet = 0.5% - 2% of bankroll
Maximum exposure = 5% - 10% of bankroll
LUCK.IO:
Maximum single bet = 100% of bankroll (estimated)
Maximum exposure = UNDEFINED / RECKLESS
VERDICT: NOT OPERATING AS A LEGITIMATE CASINO